Role
Ideation, UX Process, Prototype, All 3D Animation
Time Line
June- September 2024
Team
Batuhan Sutbeyaz - Transportation Systems Design
Bianca Zhuang - Product Design
Effie Zhu - Interaction Design
Sam Lu - Product Design
Project Overview
1212121211121212e of Design's Interaction Design MDes program.

A compact, AI-powered robotaxi designed for San Francisco.

It anticipates your needs, enhances lifestyle efficiency, and seamlessly connects you with the city.



Primary  Research


/
Ideation

01

Insights Cluster


02

Ideation Cluster

03

HMW Cluster




/ User Interview







Design  Objective



Problem Statement


How can we reconstruct the ride-hailing experience without drivers?

How can we reimagine mobility to deliver an intuitive experience that meets each user's personalized needs and enriched local insights?

Secondary  Research


/
Problems of San Francisco

01

Limited Public Transportation Coverage

Public transit has restricted service areas and limited operating hours, failing to meet commuter demands.

02

Insufficient Last-Mile Solutions

There’s a gap between transit hubs and final destinations, making travel inconvenient.

03

High Ridesharing Costs

Ridesharing fares start at $15+, with San Francisco and San Jose ranking #3 and #5 among the most expensive cities in the U.S. for transportation.




04

High Cost of Car Ownership

San Francisco residents face an annual parking fee of $2801 and an average gas price of $4.97, creating significant financial pressure



05

Growing Commute Demands

120,000 commuters enter the Bay Area daily; 33% commute 15-29 minutes, and 24% commute 30-44 minutes.

06

Massive Tourist Influx

As a top tourist destination, San Francisco attracts over 21 million visitors annually, increasing the strain on transportation systems.





/ Competitive Analysis

Rideshare (Uber & Lyft)

  • On-demand usage flexibility to request rides anytime.
  • Ability to communicate directly with drivers to meet specific needs.

  • High cost, making it expensive for regular use.
  • Long wait times during peak hours.
  • Rider experience varies, depending heavily on the driver.
Autonomous Ride (Zoox & Waymo)

  • Consistent and unified rider experience.
  • Strong focus on safety and privacy.

  • Extremely expensive, limiting accessibility for most users.
  • No immediate help available from attendants or drivers.
  • Limited coverage areas, reducing convenience for broader usage.
Public Transportation (SFMTA)
  • Low cost, making it highly affordable for most commuters.
  • Covers a relatively large operational area.

  • Unreliable schedules, often causing delays.
  • Falls short on safety and hygiene standards.
  • No privacy, leading to a less comfortable experience.



User Persona


/
Exterior





/
Interior







/
Interaction




/
Design System

Design


/
Exterior





/
Interior







/
Interaction




/
System Guide